i got one of those emails the other day , im sorry , but no it was an auto eeldteif you cant dignify me with a personal email , i think its time to not dignify you with a response well,tell me why i should use all my amazing skills to pleasure you when you just copy and pasted me into your list, wow im thrilled beyond words that you copied and pasted just for me .writing erotica, ok , yeah I have plenty of skills in that area, do I use them on this site, admittedly no , im trackable on the other site where I have been writing for a long time .Funny thing is that once I had someone try to use my own story to try and pick me up , that was funny as all heckYou find somones interest , they like things , and dont like others, tracking thier interests then write specificly for that person , thier tastes, some like explicit, others the implication is so much better and hotter, it depends on the audience , really if youre going to write small audience or on a site thats been around for ages and 100s of thusands of hits daily , then aim for your key audience
xfWjkCjaaEXXb wrote:
13/03/2012 23:47
Good post with tips that I think are very appropriate to posts that have facts and ifgures but this just wouldn't work on a relationship site like mine I moderate but it's not to stop negative comments but to stem the flow of them as the sheer volume of them was spiraling out of control. What this also does though, is stop anything inappropriate and off topic from seeing the light of the day making a really great community. I don't care about people disagreeing (some great discussions can come out of it) I publish those comments without batting an eyelid. I also don't feel the need to always respond to it as often, people who do leave negative comments can try to bait you into something. Where I don't publish negative comments is if they are off topic, personal, libelous, or publishing it could impact greatly a very vulnerable person (if it's directed to someone specific). These are few and far between but it's 7 years of blogging that caused me to establish a transparent commenting policy and I think it's very difficult to have a blanket, one size fits all mentality about comments.
DSGiOttBMPXGjWk wrote:
13/03/2012 23:38
My very first commenter was a Pittsburgh mom who espaipdared a few weeks after finding my site. Like, she wrote something bad about her sister on her site, and then vanished, deleted blog and all. I still wonder about her . . . I'm thinking there was some sort of epic battle that went down..-= Burgh Baby's last blog post: =-.
Fildfnugl wrote:
13/03/2012 23:38
I've had somebody clautaly post their blog entry in my comments. I don't know they what they were thinking but that is the weirdest spam I ever got. It sucks when you clautaly have to post spam rules. What is this world coming to.
gZfvmGxPCPPAiuCCOY wrote:
13/03/2012 15:38
sigh. i'm yet another iplifino commenter, made aware of this post thanks to google and the search phrase, pinoy seo. so what can i say. a lot's already been mentioned previously (way, way previously since this post's from march of 2007). i don't usually comment on anything more than a week old, but i find that i'm unable to help myself.i do find the original post derogatory. i agree that there was no need to highlight the commenter's nationality as this should have been irrelevant to the post's thesis.it does look rather mean, focusing on the commenter's mistakes in grammar, when the meat of the comment itself is, while not uber substantial, still what appears to be a good faith effort at a true comment, not to mention one that praises your work.i'm not saying that one should not criticize those who praise you, but this seemed a little too much.also, there was no need to post the ip address. that was completely unnecessary, as pointed out by another previous comment.i do appreciate the fact that, at the top of the post, you acknowledge that parts of your post were inappropriate. i cannot go so far as to commend you though as i do feel indirectly slighted.a truly unfortunate instance here. nobody wins with a post like this. everybody loses.
gZfvmGxPCPPAiuCCOY wrote:
13/03/2012 15:38
sigh. i'm yet another iplifino commenter, made aware of this post thanks to google and the search phrase, pinoy seo. so what can i say. a lot's already been mentioned previously (way, way previously since this post's from march of 2007). i don't usually comment on anything more than a week old, but i find that i'm unable to help myself.i do find the original post derogatory. i agree that there was no need to highlight the commenter's nationality as this should have been irrelevant to the post's thesis.it does look rather mean, focusing on the commenter's mistakes in grammar, when the meat of the comment itself is, while not uber substantial, still what appears to be a good faith effort at a true comment, not to mention one that praises your work.i'm not saying that one should not criticize those who praise you, but this seemed a little too much.also, there was no need to post the ip address. that was completely unnecessary, as pointed out by another previous comment.i do appreciate the fact that, at the top of the post, you acknowledge that parts of your post were inappropriate. i cannot go so far as to commend you though as i do feel indirectly slighted.a truly unfortunate instance here. nobody wins with a post like this. everybody loses.
gZfvmGxPCPPAiuCCOY wrote:
13/03/2012 15:38
sigh. i'm yet another iplifino commenter, made aware of this post thanks to google and the search phrase, pinoy seo. so what can i say. a lot's already been mentioned previously (way, way previously since this post's from march of 2007). i don't usually comment on anything more than a week old, but i find that i'm unable to help myself.i do find the original post derogatory. i agree that there was no need to highlight the commenter's nationality as this should have been irrelevant to the post's thesis.it does look rather mean, focusing on the commenter's mistakes in grammar, when the meat of the comment itself is, while not uber substantial, still what appears to be a good faith effort at a true comment, not to mention one that praises your work.i'm not saying that one should not criticize those who praise you, but this seemed a little too much.also, there was no need to post the ip address. that was completely unnecessary, as pointed out by another previous comment.i do appreciate the fact that, at the top of the post, you acknowledge that parts of your post were inappropriate. i cannot go so far as to commend you though as i do feel indirectly slighted.a truly unfortunate instance here. nobody wins with a post like this. everybody loses.
MFEPJxWPg wrote:
13/03/2012 13:40
Young sexy babe with big titties gets sexy ass and kitty feckud Blonde milf with gigantic boobs fucking got mommy Blonde bus riding slut gets long dicked after sucking some meat shyla stylez work round ass deep pussy action
lmUNUSNDxWLb wrote:
13/03/2012 12:08
That's the best awnser by far! Thanks for contributing.
